The author, The Editorial Board, probably intended to reach out to pro-gun audiences, in hopes of exposing them to the opposing views. Pro Gun-Control does not mean ban all guns. The Editorial Board is credible, due to providing information from an experienced official, whose occupation involves guns. I believe that The Editorial Board is arguing against the ideal of arming teachers, and instead is calling for, "banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines," as well as, "tightening background checks."
I agree with the author completely, and also believe a mental health assessment should be included in the process of obtaining a gun. If someone isn't willing to go through more requirements to acquire a gun, then maybe they don't want/need one as much as they think. Teachers have a sole purpose to educate their students, and adding the responsibility of a gun to their classroom would only add to the possible ideal of a shooting happening any day. Schools already take precaution to prevent shootings with lockdown drills, why add a gun? Seems like the reason for these implementations are solely due to guns themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment